Local GovernmentFuture
Stories/City council
City council · Leadership Development

280 people leaders had a say before the first draft existed

A city council needed a leadership framework and five programmes built on it. It did not want a small project team writing that on everybody's behalf, so every one of its 280 people leaders went through a design workshop first.

ClientA city council, around 1,500 staff
ServicesLeadership Development
Four women discussing printed charts at a table, a colleague on a video screen behind
The framework started with workshops for all 280 people leaders.
280
people leaders shaped the design
5
leadership programmes, five days each
25
days of programme content designed
All
staff attend at least one of the five

Forty people leaders went first, the executive team and their direct reports. Two hundred and forty more followed across four more sessions. Nothing had been written down yet.

The challenge

The council employs around 1,500 people. It needed a leadership capability framework, and five programmes built on it, running from leading yourself up to leading the organisation. Taituarā runs leadership programmes for council staff around the country, so a council is not short of options. What this one wanted was something in its own words.

The executive had a condition. The framework had to use words its own people leaders would actually say, in an ordinary conversation with their staff. So the executive decided those managers should write it rather than receive it.

What we did

Council staff shaped the content through workshops, a leadership conference, and four sessions with an internal design team working on the framework. We ran the process, sorted the material and wrote the drafts, then showed people where their contribution had gone.

01
Started at the top. Half a day with the executive team and their direct reports, forty people leaders.
02
Ran the same session four more times. Same format, half a day each, until all 280 people leaders had been through one.
03
Put the themes back to the whole group. We pulled the themes out of all five workshops and tested them with every people leader at once, at the council's leadership conference, then ran sessions there to sharpen specific parts of the framework.
04
Let ten managers mark our drafts. Ten managers from across the organisation, plus the organisation development team, met with us four times. They checked that each draft still sounded like the council.

Managers recognised their own wording in the drafts. We never had to run a campaign to introduce it.

Capability Group, from the project record

The outcome

The final framework sets out the leadership behaviours and personal qualities the council expects. Five programmes sit under it, five days each, with lesson plans, slides and workbooks. The council approved all five after three rounds of drafting, on time and on budget. Because the programmes run from self leadership up to executive leadership, every staff member attends at least one of them.

Managers had already worked through the framework in the workshops, at the conference and across the drafts, so nobody had to be persuaded of it afterwards. One study of change programmes found that people who help plan a change are more likely to say it reached their daily work, and less likely to push back on it.

The trust built during the design paid off later. Facilitators could change content for a particular cohort without anybody worrying the framework was being watered down, because everybody already knew where it had come from.

What transfers to other councils

01
Agree the dates before anybody drafts. A written process with review dates is what lets you park a good idea that arrives too late, rather than reopen the whole thing.
02
Name who decides, and keep the list short. One decision maker, named writers, named reviewers, on both sides, including any internal design team. Everybody else comments through them. Otherwise every review meeting turns into another design meeting.
03
Hold the council to its own dates too. The slowest part of a project like this is usually the client's feedback loop, not the writing. Agree how long each review gets, and say it out loud at the start.

You do not need 280 people to get the benefit, but the people who will use the framework do need to recognise their own work and language in it. The workshops were the easy part. The work that took time was earning trust with a lot of managers, then showing them which suggestions had been kept, which had changed and why. Skip that and you are back to a framework in a folder.

Share this story
LinkedInEmail

More stories

All stories

Your council could be the next story.

We'll listen first.

Book a conversation